Wisconsin Public Radio

Manufacturing is still critical to the economy United States. Clyde Prestowitz, says it's time to start realizing the positive spillovers that manufacturing creates... Read more  

Events & Activities

Stephen Olson at Chinese Development Institute Conference


 Clyde Prestowitz giving presentation to CDI...


Steve Olson teaching trade negotiations at the Mekong Institute...


Stephen Olson to speak at upcoming workshop organized by the International Institute for Trade and Development on 

"Economics of GMS Agricultural trade in goods and services towards the world market"

Chiangmai, Thailand Sep 8-12.

Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy

What Determines Exchange Rate Regimes? The Trilemma and its Consequences

Click Here to Download the Full Report in PDF Format

Image Exchange rate regimes, author Ben Carliner argues, are determined by three main factors:

First, policy makers are faced with the structural constraints imposed by the so-called trilemma - the inability to maintain the combination of a fixed exchange rate, free capital mobility, and a monetary policy oriented toward domestic needs.

Second, the continuing growth of deep, liquid financial markets and institutions, along with rising international trade and investment, has made international capital flows increasingly hard to regulate. Given the constraints imposed by the trilemma, the difficulties in imposing and maintaining capital controls further limit the range of policy options available to governments. 

Third, domestic political considerations - primarily interest group pressure to orient monetary policy towards specific domestic goals like full employment, inflation rate targeting, or exchange rate stability - cause policy makers to respond to the constraints imposed by the trilemma in predictable ways. That is, governments, especially democratic governments that can be held accountable through competitive elections, will tend to place a high value on maintaining domestic political support. 

Large economies like the US, where international trade represents a relatively small proportion of GDP, will value domestic monetary policy autonomy over stable exchange rates. Small, open economies, on the other hand, that are highly dependent upon international trade, will value the price stability that a pegged exchange provides. All this implies that most governments will choose to "move to the corners," and adopt either floating exchange rates or hard pegs, like currency boards or even (as in Europe) monetary unions, depending upon the make-up of the national economy and domestic interest groups. 

This paper begins with an analysis of the theoretical implications of the trilemma and free capital mobility, and then move on to examine the role of the trilemma and domestic politics with two case studies. First, we look at the decision of the Nixon administration to "close the gold window" and break the dollar peg to gold in 1971. This action triggered the collapse of the Bretton Woods international monetary regime and ushered in the modern era of floating exchange rates. Then we examine the efforts of the European Union to create a European Monetary Union and to expand the Euro to the new group of accession countries in eastern and central Europe. 

We find that the US and Europe have chosen to respond the constraints imposed by the trilemma differently - their respective electorates have distinct economic interests, and their choice of exchange rate regimes reflects those interests.

Join our mailing list

Latest Publications

The Betrayal of American Prosperity.

The Trans-Paific Partnership and Japan.

Making the Mexian Miracle.

Industrial Policy and Rebalancing in the US and China.

The Evolving Role of China in International Institutions.


Contact us

Economic Strategy Institute

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Suite 414 |  Washington DC  |  20036
Ph (202) 213-7051  |  Fax (202) 965-1104  |  info@econstrat.org